Sunday, October 25, 2009

Book Review: The Time Traveler's Wife, Audrey Niffenegger


Beautiful. Just beautiful.

Niffenegger crafts a love story so intimate and true that it's difficult to displace from reality. Henry starts spontaneously time traveling when he's 8. He describes it as being similar to epilepsy - there are tell-tale signs when he's about to vanish, but he cannot stop it and cannot wish himself back or forward in time. At 36 he travels to a meadow where he meets a 6-year-old Clare who both is and will be his wife. Niffenegger documents their relationship and their lives together in and out and through time. It was interesting and enchanting, the way Henry knew and didn't know things. His past or future selves would leave clues or guide him through tough times. Though the novel is titled The Time Traveler's Wife, it is mostly about Henry and the effect his genetic disease has on Clare, the way she is forced to pick up the pieces and carry on without him, constantly waiting and worrying and wondering when he'll return to her. I like the title in that sense. It shows that even if the reader wanted to make Clare the main character instead of Henry, his presence is so deep within her that it's impossible to view them as separate beings. I think everyone hopes for a love like that. Their love is timeless and ephemeral simultaneously.

I feel as if Clare and Henry are still out there, somewhere in time, madly and desperately in love in a situation that forces them to rely wholly on each other. This novel was easy to read and filled with vibrant characters and gorgeous emotions. Do you know what I mean by that, saying a book has emotion? Like you can just open up the cover and be overwhelmed by it. In case you don't know what I mean, I've decided to include the letter Henry writes Clare in the event of his death -

December 10, 2006

Dearest Clare,
As I write this, I am sitting at my desk in the back bedroom looking out at your studio across the backyard full of blue evening snow, everything is slick and crusty with ice, and it is very still. It's one of those winter evenings when the coldness of every single thing seems to slow down time, like the narrow center or an hourglass which time itself flows through, but slowly, slowly. I have the feeling, very familiar to me when I am out of time but almost never otherwise, of being buoyed up by time, floating effortlessly on its surface like a fat lady swimmer. I had a sudden urge, tonight, here in the house by myself (you are at Alicia's recital at St. Lucy's) to write you a letter. I suddenly wanted to leave something, for
after. I think that time is short, now. I feel as though all my reserves, of energy, of pleasure, of duration, are thin, small. I don't feel capable of continuing very much longer. I know you know.

If you are reading this, I am probably dead. (I say probably because you never know what circumstances may arise; it seems foolish and self-important to just declare one's own death as an out-and-out fact.) About this death of mine - I hope it was simple and clean and unambiguous. I hope it didn't create too much fuss. I'm sorry. (This reads like a suicide note. Strange.) But you know: you know that if I could have stayed, if I could have gone on, that I would have clutched every second: whatever it was, this death, you know that it came and
took me, like a child carried away by goblins.

Clare, I want to tell you, again, I love you. Our love has been the thread through the labyrinth, the net under the high-wire walker, the only real thing in this strange life of mine that I could ever trust. Tonight I feel that my love for you has more density in this world than I do, myself: as though it could linger on after me and surround you, keep you, hold you.

I hate to think of you waiting. I know that you have been waiting for me all your life, always uncertain of how long this patch of waiting would be. Ten minutes, ten days. A month. What an uncertain husband I have been, Clare, like a sailor, Odysseus alone and buffeted by tall waves, sometime wily and sometimes just a plaything of the gods. Please, Clare. When I am dead. Stop waiting and be free. Of me - put me deep inside you and then go out in the world and live. Love the world and yourself in it, move through it as though it offers no resistance, as though the world is your natural element. I have given you a life of suspended animation. I don't mean to say that you have done nothing. You have created beauty, and meaning, in your art, and Alba, who is so amazing, and for me: for me you have been everything.

After my mom died she ate up my father completely. She would have hated it. Every minute of his life since then has been marked by her absence, every action has lacked dimension because she is not there to measure against. And when I was young I didn't understand, but now, I know, how absence can be present, like a damaged nerve, like a dark bird. If I had to live on without you I know I could not do it. But I hope, I have this vision of you walking unencumbered, with your shining hair in the sun. I have not seen this with my eyes, but only with my imagination, that makes pictures, that always wanted to paint you, shining; but I hope that this vision will be true, anyway.

Clare, there is one last thing, and I have hesitated to tell you, because I'm superstitiously afraid that telling might cause it to not happen (I know: silly) and also because I have just been going on about not waiting and this might cause you to wait longer than you have ever waited before. But I will tell you in case you need something,
after.
Last summer, I was sitting in Kendrick's waiting room when I suddenly found myself in a dark hallway in a house I don't know. I was sort of tangled up in a bunch of galoshes, and it smelled like rain. At the end of the hall I could see a rim of light around a door, and so I went very slowly and very quietly to the door and looked in. The room was white, and intensely lit with morning sun. At the window, with her back to me, sat a woman, wearing a coral-colored [sic] cardigan sweater, with long white hair all down her back. She had a cup of tea beside her, on a table. I must have made some little noise, or she sensed me behind her . . . she turned and saw me, and I saw her, and it was you, Clare, this was you as an old woman, in the future. It was sweet, Clare, it was sweet beyond telling, to come as though from death to hold you, and to see all the years present in your face. I won't tell you any more, so you can imagine it, so you can have it unrehearsed when the time comes, as it will, as it does come. We will see each other again, Clare. Until then, live, fully, present in the world, which is so beautiful.

It's dark, now, and I am very tired. I love you, always. Time is nothing.

Henry

Saturday, October 24, 2009

Does it count as procrastination...


...if I am putting off writing one paper to do research for my other two?

I think not.

I hope not.

I really am having trouble with writing it, which is terrible, because (so far) it's my favourite topic of all of them...

Curses curses curses. Why is November only a week away already?

It's really almost November already? Really?

I have never been one of those people who say "What happened to all the time? It seems like just yesterday we were moving in..."

Saturday, October 17, 2009

Well, look who's behind on her own times.


I think I've delayed posting for so long for several reasons. 1), my news should have been shared the weekend it happened, but I was...preoccupied...; 2), it was midterms week at school and I had five tests; 3), sometimes I miss David so much it's difficult to talk about him without getting choked up, and that's especially the case after we've had to say goodbye another time.

Fortunately, this is the second-to-last time we'll ever have to say goodbye. David proposed to me during my fall break visit. It was more perfect that I ever could have imagined, and I think that's because he took me completely by surprise. We both love being outside and going for walks (in fact, he asked me out after we had walked the entire bike trail here in Searcy), so we decided to go backpacking on the Laurel Ridge trail for 12 miles when I came up last weekend. After we had reached the half-point on our first day of hiking (which was almost completely uphill - I am not exaggerating), he set up the camera to take a few pictures of us. His hands were shaking really badly as he preset the camera, and I remember thinking That's odd...he hasn't had any caffeine today.... I saw him racing around behind me to get in the picture, and when I looked to my left, he was kneeling instead of standing. I totally didn't get it. I thought he had fallen and was slightly surprised that he had missed out on the picture. When he asked me to marry him, I immediately said "Yes," assuming he was Jim Halpert-ing me (informally proposing). I realized he was serious and amazingly did not cry (much). We took more pictures (which I would include, but it's late, and I'm lazy. They're on facebook) and the rest of the hike went swimmingly (hikingly?).

We've decided on a Pittsburgh wedding on March 7, 2010. That's about as far as we've got so far. I was never one of those girls who immaculately planned out her wedding, so it's rather ironic that I'm the first of any of my friends to be engaged. Now I'm all caught up in figuring out the budget and deciding whether or not to do this or that for the wedding and I'm still completely aware that this is the most blessed I've ever felt in my entire life, as well as completely taken aback that it happened to me at all. It's surreal and entirely real at the same time.

There's my version. You can read David's here, and pictures are here and here.

Update:
That's partially the reason why I started this blog. David and I knew within the month that we started dating that we wanted to get married someday. This has been a (relatively) long time coming. I wanted to start the blog to give updates on wedding plans, moving plans, honeymoon plans, etc., and also as a means to keep in touch with friends at Harding after I've moved to Pittsburgh.

Sunday, October 4, 2009

Don't think of it as losing quantity. Think of it as gaining probability.

I have lived in three states throughout my entire life (accepting that going away to college places your residency, albeit temporarily, in another state): Nebraska, Oklahoma, and Arkansas. Surprisingly, I've turned out relatively normal; even more surprisingly, I've managed to escape being confronted with a (poisonous) snake. Living in a populous area like Oklahoma City doesn't put you up against the likes of five different rattlesnakes, copperheads, and cottonmouths very often. Some sort of spiritual immunity hovering over the boundaries of Searcy, AR has prevented me from ever glimpsing Arkansas' three poisonous rattlesnakes, water moccasins, coral snakes, and copperheads. I've never stepped into the cornfields or onto the western sand dunes of Nebraska, thus avoiding the prairie and timber rattlesnakes, western massasuagas, and (yet again) copperheads. In fact, the only time I've ever glimpsed poisonous snakes was as the family van ran over them in Texas or my (ex)friends dragged me and forced me up against the glass cages at the Henry Doorly Zoo. I've lived a charmed existence so far, never being confronted face-to-fangs, and I hoped I would reap more blessings as I moved north. Surely snakes only live in mild or warmer climates, right? They couldn't survive the hypothermia-inducing winters of the Northeast.
Wrong.

As I tossed and turned in my bed last night, I found myself thinking of the backpacking trip David and I will take in Pennsylvania this Thursday and Friday. We're hiking six miles, camping during the night, and hiking back the next morning. This will probably be fairly commonplace when I move up there, since we both love nature, climbing rocks, and buying cute new hiking accessories (okay, the last one is only me). A passing thought suddenly gripped me with fear: placing myself out in the midst of nature would only make it
easier for the snakes to hunt me down and fang me in my sleep. Heart racing, I googled "poisonous snakes of Pennsylvania," hoping for the best. I was blown away by the results.

It turns out that snakes aren't warded away by colder climates. The same three creepers keep slithering back into my life: the timber rattlesnake, the
northern copperhead, and this time, the eastern massasuaga rattlesnake. I know there are fewer poisonous varieties than in any other state I've lived in, but that's not all - I'm basically inviting them to strike at me now by adventuring off into the woods instead of staying safe and cosy in my dorm room. And what's worse, you're not allowed to kill the rattlesnakes (those that most frequent the trails), because they're either endangered or well on their way to becoming so.

Using this piece of information, you might twist it and say "Well, if they're endangered, it's not very likely that you'll see one, right?" Wrong. They can
smell the fear.

I would post a picture of the sneaky snake that is most likely to bring about my demise, but then I would be too petrified to view my own blog. Instead, I will post this nice picture of the luck dragon from Neverending Story. I'm going to need all the luck I can get.



Saturday, October 3, 2009

I am already tired of this blog.


This happens sometimes with me and blogs. I will be bored out of my mind one day and think "Wouldn't it be awesome if I had a blog? Then people could read my awesome thoughts and think about how awesome I am and we could become bff and fill the world with our awesomeness." And then I start one and realize I have nothing to talk about and people are probably judging me for how un-awesome I am and then I realize that surprise (but really not because I've known it all along), there are like three people reading and they are only doing it because they love me and understand that sometimes I need comments to feel important. Except usually I don't return the favour (sorry, David).

Anyway, I'm still awake, as is usual on Friday and Saturday nights (and sometimes random Wednesdays). I had planned to read Dead Until Dark by Charlaine Harris all in one go tonight, but then Jo, Adria, Delaney and I all watched the Mothman Prophecies (weird) and went to Sonic and David and I watched Hotel Rwanda and he wouldn't let me adopt Rwandan babies. I'm still awake because I still want to read a good portion of Charlaine Harris tonight, but I have been distracted with movies and reading blogs and other strange and random things.

I was thinking about a conversation (argument/epic challenge) that Becca, Adria, and I had earlier. Becca and I wanted pizza (mmmm!) after class, and she had a pepperoni one in the freezer, but when I took it out all the pepperoni were lined up in the middle of the pizza with just a few outliers on the edges. I don't know what kind of crazy person is okay with that, so I took off all the pepperoni and fixed them so they were more evenly spaced (though not perfectly even, as Becca would tell you). Becca thought I was being so ridiculous that she took a picture and memorialized how creepy my hands can look for eternity, but not really because I doubt it will be uploaded to anywhere. Then Adria came home and I made her (/asked politely if she would) tell Becca that rearranging uneven pizza toppings is perfectly rational and normal. Then Becca said we were BOTH crazy and all three of us changed our facebook statuses to get as many opinions as possible (Adria and I won. By...a lot). Sometime in the middle of this I grabbed my phone to text David, because I do that sometimes when I do things that people think are ridiculous. I always ask "Is it weird to do _____?" and because I am the one asking he knows I am the one doing it so he almost always says "You are a strange girl. But I still love you" and I kind of chuckle to myself because let's face it, I am a strange girl. Anyway, this time he agreed with me, which made me wonder...when did David become my pillar of rationality? He is not the most rational person. In fact, he thinks Republicans should be isolated from the rest of the world. I don't really have a point, except that sometimes, I am the most rational person in the world the most rational non-Republican person in the world more rational than David. So chew on that. And also maybe in the future, ignore any posts I make after midnight.

xoxo Heather

Thursday, October 1, 2009

Book Review: The Virgin Suicides, Jeffrey Eugenides


I was encouraged to read The Virigin Suicides by my roommate, Adria. I purchased the movie version for her as a birthday present last year. We watched it one night close to finals week when we were supposed to be doing important scholastic things, so I already knew how the story ended, even if the novel included more background and further plot developments. I guess it doesn't take much to figure the basic concept out; it's right there in the title. Regardless, I think knowing the ending ruined the novel for me.

The story centers around five Lisbon girls, aged from 13 to 17: Cecilia, Lux, Bonnie, Mary, and Therese. Their parents are extremely devout Catholics who don't allow the girls to socialize properly. The youngest attempts to commit suicide, but fails; she is successful a few weeks later, and this provides the context for most of the novel. Told from a first person plural perspective by the Lisbon-obsessed boys of the neighbourhood, The Virgin Suicides explores how Cecilia's death affects her sisters and the rest of the neighbourhood.

I measure whether a novel is good or not by the feeling I get upon its completion. That's why I have such issues with beginning a book and then laying it aside - I feel I can't judge it properly unless I've read it all the way through. The only thing I'm overcome with is disappointment. The concept of five beautiful virgin teenage girls (well, four - Lux is a bit of a temptress) is alluring enough to pique curiosity, even if that's the only context. However, the context the Eugenides provides makes their deaths seem inconsequential, since everyone in the neighbourhood (and therefore his readers) expects it to happen. Maybe there's something in his boldness with such a tender subject that I'm missing; maybe that lack of surprise is what Eugenides felt would "make" his novel. If that's the case, I just don't see it.

Here's what I do see: an interesting concept explained by a great voice (having the boys of the neighbourhood narrate was genius, the best thing about Virgin Suicides, in my opinion) that has been lost in a molasses-slow plot and inconsistency. All signs point to the parents as the causation of the Lisbon girls' suicides, but they never do anything actively terrible. Also, two of the girls successfully kill themselves with sleeping pills. I've only done a modicum of research about suicide for a school project back in seventh grade for my health class, but even I know that taking sleeping pills is one of the least effective ways to commit suicide. The body automatically rejects the amount of toxicity by causing the consumer to vomit the pills back out. This wasn't a minute detail, it was one of the defining points of the novel. It seemed like Eugenides hadn't done much research, and that made me less inclined to appreciate his writing.

This whole novel made me reconsider what I deem to be good writing. Does a great idea make a good novel? A great plot? Characters? Themes? I don't think a novel can be considered truly great unless it has several of these characteristics, and that is why The Virgin Suicides does not meet my standards of a good work of fiction. I have tagged it an an "airplane book" because that's what I consider it to be: it doesn't matter if you get distracted, because it's not a novel that requires concentration and active thinking. This novel is good for whiling away the hours, but not for sparking intellectual curiosity. I wouldn't recommend not reading it, but I wouldn't recommend reading it, either.



My suitemates are crazy

...but I love them.